next pic answers ur concern...we really took a good "look" at it.

we were checking the gender of the loco.:)btw the other guy is antony.

Nice Pic Jimmy Deepak & Pawan kya dekh rahe he niche

This is the only photo of the audience taken by Vrij, which does not show the back of their heads. For those who don't know Vrij was seated right at the back of the hall managing the blog.

Lovely pic.

@Bharat/Ramdev,

Would the correct classification for the wagons be BOBYN?

Though the coach look cool, the finer workmanship was really poor (eg seen here, the latch would not fasten with each other. Also, the two halves of latches of side lower berth would not match. The chain holding Middle berth with upper would not fasten etc)

The parking lot is for four-wheelers. And it appears that the pic has been taken from the entrance of the same.

@Ranjeet,

AFAIK, the DLW staff committed the same mistake as you did in number estimation. They were informed that GM would supply 10 locomotives, hence assumed that the last loco would be #20010, and therefore numbered their first loco as #20011. However, GM numbered the first loco as #20000, and hence the last loco of the consignment was #20009.

Now about your doubt,

#20011 is the 1st loco of DLW.
#20012 is the 2nd loco.
.
.
.
#20068 is the 58th loco.

Perform the complete count on your fingers or on paper, and you will be able to verify this :-)

Why was there a goof-up in numbering? Recently I spotted WDP-4 #20068. The was a metal plate sticked to it which told it was the 58th loco manufactured by DLW. SO does the numbering for DLW starts from 20011?

Brilliant shot!!!Smoking at its best!!!